Requests for manual recount of defeated candidates Tina Peters and Ron Hanks rejected


Two former Colorado GOP candidates who endorse election denial demands cannot get a manual vote recount in their races in the 2022 primary election, the director of the Elections Division told them this week. State.

Indicted Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters was a candidate for the GOP nomination for Secretary of State and Colorado House Rep. Ron Hanks was seeking the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate. Both lost their races by large enough margins not to automatically trigger a recount – the margin of victory should be less than half a percent.

Peters lost by 88,579 votes statewide, a difference of 14.2% of the votes from opponent Pam Anderson. Hanks lost by 56,563 votes, a difference of 8.92% of the votes to opponent Joe O’Dea.

Candidates have the option of requesting a recount of their elections despite the voting margins, but they would have to pay the costs that the counties would incur to conduct the recounts. Both Hanks and Peters requested recounts in letters notarized July 12 and 13 and sent to the Colorado secretary of state’s office. The bureau cited the cost of recounts in each race at $236,279.37, and the law requires candidates to pay the fee within a day of receiving the estimate.

Neither candidate submitted payment by the deadline. In letters dated July 15, Peters and Hanks then asked about the cost of manual recounts for their races, making identical statements about security vulnerabilities and problems with the Dominion voting systems used – a common target for theorists of the election plot.

However, election rules state that recounts must be conducted in the same manner as the original election, Elections Division Director Judd Choate wrote Peters and Hanks on Tuesday. The only way to allow a different type of recount is if there were certain discrepancies that did not occur in this election.

Additionally, Choate refuted the security claims and said the candidates’ reference to “rigorous post-election tabulation audits of human-readable portions of physical ballots and paper records” had already been conducted by counties, and this confirmed the outcome of the race without any discrepancies reported by any county.

If either candidate still wishes to conduct a recount using the same systems as permitted by law, they have until July 26 to submit new notarized requests and payment of associated fees, wrote Choate.

Neither Peters nor Hanks or their campaigns responded to requests for comment Wednesday afternoon.

The Colorado County Clerks Association said in a statement on Wednesday that Peters emailed county clerks saying she planned to request a manual recount of votes from “selected counties” but did not elaborate. which counties,” nor explained his authority to request this illegal form of recount”.

The association said it had not heard of any clerks receiving a similar request from Hanks.

“Clearly, Peters’ request is part of a larger effort to create chaos, disruption and sow doubt in our election,” executive director Matt Crane said. “Voters have already sent a resounding message to these people by ensuring that election deniers on the statewide ballot are voted out. This seems like just another stunt to try and sound legit.

Crane said Peters should stop trying to deceive the citizens of Colorado “with his election lies and lack of knowledge,” and instead let the “real election professionals” continue to run safe and secure elections.

The office of the Colorado secretary of state said in a statement that “unequivocally, these allegations are false” of the assertions made in the Peters and Hanks letters.

“The Republican Senate and the Secretary of State’s primary race have each been audited, and the results have been confirmed as accurate by bipartisan election judges,” the statement said.


Source link